Serving Southeast Michigan For Over 30 Years.

Sixth Circuit Holds That Limiting Discussion at Public Meetings to Relevant Issues and Removing Disruptive Audience Does Not Violate Constitution

O’Reilly Rancilio attorneys Marc Kaszubski and Nathan Petrusak successfully defended the City of Sterling Heights in a federal court challenge involving the Open Meetings Act. The case (Youkhanna, et al. v. City of Sterling Heights, et al. No. 18-1874 6th Cir.) affirms a lower court determination that the mayor’s actions to remove disruptive council meeting attendees complied with constitutional and Open Meetings Act requirements.

The court’s opinion and order settles a split between the Sixth and Second circuits with respect to the Fourth Amendment and its application to the removal of an individual from a public meeting by a police officer after that person is called out of order. The decision further clarifies the proper constitutional analysis for a limited public forum under the First Amendment, and has a broad impact on all public meetings conducted by a municipality. To read more, click here.

Categories: Municipal

For More Information

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Press Room

Mar
16
The municipal law attorneys at O'Reilly Rancilio have developed a team to respond to questions that local government officials may have during the COVID-19 crisis. Read More
Feb
21
Michigan Lawyers Weekly has named O’Reilly Rancilio attorney Marc Kaszubski to its Leaders in the Law Class of 2020. Kaszubski is one of only 30 honorees selected… Read More
Read More From Our Press Room

Blog

Apr
1
As every business has been affected by the Covid-19 crisis, you should seriously consider a loan through the federal government’s Paycheck Protection Program, whic… Read More
Mar
31
On March 27, the federal government passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security “CARES” Act which is meant to, among many other things, sup… Read More
Read More From Our Blog