Serving Southeast Michigan For Over 30 Years.

Sixth Circuit Holds That Limiting Discussion at Public Meetings to Relevant Issues and Removing Disruptive Audience Does Not Violate Constitution

O’Reilly Rancilio attorneys Marc Kaszubski and Nathan Petrusak successfully defended the City of Sterling Heights in a federal court challenge involving the Open Meetings Act. The case (Youkhanna, et al. v. City of Sterling Heights, et al. No. 18-1874 6th Cir.) affirms a lower court determination that the mayor’s actions to remove disruptive council meeting attendees complied with constitutional and Open Meetings Act requirements.

The court’s opinion and order settles a split between the Sixth and Second circuits with respect to the Fourth Amendment and its application to the removal of an individual from a public meeting by a police officer after that person is called out of order.  The decision further clarifies the proper constitutional analysis for a limited public forum under the First Amendment, and has a broad impact on all public meetings conducted by a municipality.  To read more, click here.

Categories: Municipal

For More Information

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Press Room

Eight O'Reilly Rancilio attorneys have made the peer-selected Super Lawyers list. Read More
The Oakland County Legal News recognized O’Reilly Rancilio summer law clerk Dean Michel in their July 29, 2019 edition.  The article, titled “Litigation Vocatio… Read More
Read More From Our Press Room


While a strong managerial, sales, finance and support staff is key, successful business owners should always hire an attorney to be a part of that team. Read More
Will you ever be able to say the word "the" again without making a hefty contribution to THE Ohio State? Read More
Read More From Our Blog